Texas Asbestos Lawsuit History

Many companies have gone bankrupt because of the asbestos lawsuits filed by victims. A knowledgeable mesothelioma lawyer will help you obtain compensation.

Experts in the field of health have warned for years about the dangers of asbestos exposure. But, some industry leaders minimized the risks. Over time, more and more people were diagnosed with asbestos-related illnesses.

The Third Case

Asbestos lawsuits really began to gain momentum in the 1970s after research studies began to link Asbestos Mesothelioma Lawsuit to serious illnesses such as mesothelioma or asbestosis. Since these diseases typically don't develop symptoms until decades after exposure, thousands of lawsuits were filed. These lawsuits were filed in Texas because of its favorable laws.

Johns Manville was the leading producer in the 1940s and 1950s of asbestos products. This case had a significant impact on asbestos poisoning lawsuit litigation. In the 1980s, it was brought to be known that the company's chief executive Lewis Brown prioritized company profits over the health of his employees. In his deposition testimony he admitted to being heavily dependent on Dr. Russell Budd, the chief medical advisor to his company. Budd, a doctor who was known for his smug disregard for the health of employees was a well-known persona.

The evidence proved that Johns Manville knew about the asbestos dangers but took no action to protect its employees. The court found that the company is accountable for any damages suffered by workers who later develop mesothelioma asbestos lawsuit, or other asbestos-related illnesses. The court also ruled that the company was liable for asbestos mesothelioma lawsuit damages to the families of deceased workers.

Following the decision in Borel many asbestos victims and their families sought compensation from the companies that used this material. Most of the claims were denied for a variety reasons. Some cases were allowed to be heard and the courts drafted a set of guidelines for the handling of asbestos class action suit-related suits.

In the 1990s, asbestos defendants were still seeking legal rulings to reduce their liability. For instance they wanted to be able to argue that the asbestos lawsuit settlements taxable materials were not part of their product, and therefore shouldn't be held accountable for injuries sustained by people who worked with them. These arguments were not successful and the U.S. Supreme Court rejected the "asbestos products" defense.

Federal and state laws protect the right of a mesothelioma patient to seek compensation for their condition from the parties accountable in a particular case. However insurance companies continue to fight these claims with a hammer and a sledgehammer.